| |
|

click on the links to the right to
navigate within this feature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nast's Contribution to
"A Cotton Office in New Orleans"
by Albert I. Boime |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Degas seminal painting of his New
Orleans visit, A Cotton Office in New Orleans, owes a
conspicuous debt to Nasts illustrations for Harpers Weekly.
The perspicacious French critic, Emile Zola, observed that the picture reminded him
in part of "a plate from an illustrated journal." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Edgar Degas, A Cotton Office in
New Orleans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We know that when Degas was in the United
States he read the illustrated newspapers, but Zola could never have guessed, however,
that the main source was Nasts Going Through
the Form of Universal Suffrage of November 11, 1871. Nasts cartoon
was part of his relentless assault on Tammany corruption, depicting innocent voters
dropping their ballots in to a wastebasket while the Tweed gang loafs cynically behind the
table on which it rests. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Going Through The Form Of
Universal Suffrage
Harper's Weekly, November 11, 1871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "Cotton Office" was located
at 63 Carondelet Street (today it is 407 Carondelet Street) at the corner of Perdido
Street. Its actual name was Musson, Prestidge & Company, Cotton Factors and
Commissioner Merchants. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Degas included several relatives in the
picture. Among them, his uncle, Michel Musson, senior partner of the firm, is seated in
the front. His brother, René De Gas, is seated near the center, reading the newspaper;
his other brother, Achille De Gas, is the dandy standing at the far left. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Cotton
Office represents Degas attempt to capture the informality of
American comportment and the casual atmosphere of a busy commercial enterprise. Nast must
have fascinated him in this respect, since no one surpassed the cartoonist in catching the
physical gestures and informal bearing of his countrymen. Nasts figures of New York
mayor, Oakey Hall, who leans nonchalantly against the wall with one leg crossed over the
other, and Tweed, who supports himself by leaning heavily on the table with both arms,
provided Degas with the poses both of Achille De Gas and of an unidentified man examining
merchandise on the far side of the table. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both pairs wear identical headgear, a tall
silk hat and a derby. Slight variations in the figures are less important than their
shared look of idle casualness, and the fact that they occupy analogous stations in their
respective medium. Although Degas reversed Nasts perspectival scheme and set his
figures in a different plane, Achille and Mayor Hall stand at the extreme edge of the
picture with their respective counterparts flanking them just inside the composition. The
diagonal established by the two figures in each instance parallels the wall receding
toward the opposite end of the interior. Another link between the two works is the
partitioned-off cubicle behind the figures, where a seated man is shown cut off, save for
head and shoulders, by the figure leaning on the table who faces in the opposite
direction. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Various other details may be compared: the
similar location and period-style of the low-back office chair in the left foreground of
both pictures, the bystanders in the background, and the curious affinity between the
sprawling position of Degas brother René reading the newspaper and the careless
abandon of Nasts police guard. Even the affected casualness in the rendering of
Renés trousers recalls Nasts stylistic idiosyncrasies, especially evident in
Nasts drawing of the American ambassador to China seated at the far right in The
Youngest Introducing the Oldest. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

The Youngest Introducing The
Oldest
Harper's Weekly, July 18, 1868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The treatment of orthogonals and abrupt
cropping of figures in Cotton
Office and Universal
Suffrage also reveal striking similarities. While Degas achieves a
feeling of immediacy by abruptly segmenting the upper wall planes by the picture plane,
Nast arrives at a similar result by gradually fading out the wall surfaces before they
reach the edge of the picture. Nast is intent on retaining the integrity of his foreground
plane, but his abrupt segmentation of the standing guard by the column at the left may be
likened to the seemingly random cropping of Degas uncle in the foreground of Cotton
Office. There is a further parallel between Nasts framing
column and what appears to be a jamb and shutter at the extreme left of Degas
picture. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Still another Nast cartoon supplied Degas
with local color for Cotton
Officethe Put
Yourself in His Place of March 4, 1871. The correspondence between the
lefthand portion of Degas picture and the cartoon is particularly evident: figures
poring over account books with desks in disarray, high stools and messy wastebaskets, all
serve to create similar environments. Yet it is not so much the presence of these details
as their internal relationships that suggest more than coincidental resemblance. The high
stool stands next to a low-back office chair facing toward the left, which in turn faces a
table whose style is similar in both cases. Even the wastebasket is analogously located in
the two pictures, and it is significantdespite the fact that Degas reveals only the
topthat they are made of the same wicker material and braided in large loops at the
rim. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Put Yourself In His Place
Harper's Weekly, March 4, 1871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While Degas painting is in some
respects a family portrait, he did not paint it on the spot in his uncles firm. The
work was the product of a "studio" synthesis. During the final phases of
execution, he made use of visual sources that he had gathered during his stay in New
Orleans to provide his work with authentic atmosphere and the images of bodily gestures
and attitudes that Nast translated so powerfully into graphic terms. Degas studio
practice typically consisted of the careful processing of eclectic borrowings from a
variety of sources including commercial illustration. Yet nothing so aptly discloses the
intertextuality of artistic exchange in the nineteenth century than this relationship
between a French pioneer of modern painting and an American cartoonist who helped shape
the symbolic vocabulary of the native political tradition. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This site is brought to you
by

Website and all Content © 1998-1999 HarpWeek, LLC
Please report problems to webmaster@harpweek.com |
|